I got an email just before the voice from Rockliff saying hello and how can I help with anything. No idea how he got my email?? I was planning to answer him by asking him how he voted Yes and why he was wrong and how I knew it was a complete lie and didn't he get that? Now I have just read your article...thank you more to put in my reply to him. It wont be kind. I will probably start with How dare you ...
I agree with Bella that they had a bigger Agenda. They needed our First Nation people as a separate "nation" to be able to treat with them, to manipulate their woke politicians and Elders so they could force Australia's compliance in their O.W. Agenda. And they're not stopping, so we need to speak up. Thanks for your engaging voice in all this. May God bless, strengthen and protect you and your family.
love your funny, insightful , truthful commentary, as usual James, but you obviously haven't been in a childcare facility lately if you think kids today are being taught to understand "No" ! They only learn that in a certain, probably conservative, family environment. Most children's babysitters, you know---the Telly, schools, Kindergartens, etc--aren't allowed to say "no", they're only allowed to distract the uncooperative beggars, I mean children. Plus, the Government never had any intention of listening. Like children ,the beggars, I mean politicians of certain persuasions, have been trying to distract US!
Agreed with all of what you say so eloquently James.... & yes Albo, go back to dealing with the other 97% of Australians & stop wasting our tax on your own personal "do-gooder" agendas!
This is genuinely distressing, James. Albanese's hero was Whitlam. Perhaps we'll get a double disillusion like someone else has mentioned I hope. Is that hoping too much? I think that's the only way that they ( Labor/teal/ green) are going to listen.
Do we remember them saying to a waiter, "Don't you know who I am?" From a politician I had never heard of and still can't remember their name.
Whitlam didn't even try to ask us when he changed the constitution and turned us into a company (LLC) so they could go bankrupt every few years and not have to pay their loans back. That was totally illegal and means that the new constitution is not legal and we are still under the 1901 constitution, but they are using the new one because we have not stopped them by saying NO loud enough for them to hear and so they claim assumed consent, so we need to send them a message saying we never consented to the changes and they should all be arrested for treason and tried in military courts.
You're right again! I don't know why the states are all forging ahead with their own treaties (except for WA - burned recently by the Heritage Laws, no doubt). But I'm puzzled. Who are they making treaties with? Depending on what you read, there are between 250 and 500 mobs in Australia and they each have their own language and territory. Are we going to have to form treaties with each group? They were never "one nation" and will probably never be united. I have a better idea - let's just embrace them as Australians and live alongside them as equals. Why didn't we think of that before!
Lidia Thorpe made exactly that point. If you're going to make treaties (which she supports) the need to be done individually with each group since none can speak for the others.
I hadn't heard that comment, though I know she supports treaty. The orchestrators of the Voice really wanted it enshrined Federally, not in the state governments, because the Federal government has much deeper pockets and could afford to pay them a lot more. I was shocked to hear them say this! Just what we need, to bankrupt the country at a time such as this.
Only one comment to the brain dead PM and other Pollies who cant understand NO means NO !!! There is a age old phrase in theses situations ......." FOLLOW THE MONEY """
“The arrogance of this government is staggering. Which begs the question, are these guys idiots? “
Actually they’re not idiots. They are very arrogant in pursuing the aims of the elite and with great success. The failure of the expensive and toxic referendum is just a hiccup which, although it annoyingly lengthens the process for them, it can in their view, still be overcome. While it is reassuring that 6 in 10 Aussies are opposed to this route, it's a pity we can't get true representation in parliament. Unfortunately the enemy has mastered their manipulation of the so called democratic structure of our election processes when it comes to who finally governs. Did you know that taxpayer funding for parties for subsequent elections is based on the number of votes each party gets and by its cutoff point excludes all the minors. Did you know that in Victoria Comrade Dan's mate, Glen Druery setup a new party called the Sack Dan Andrews Party purely to trick voters and draw votes from other minor parties? Then there's the buying off of the preferences. (This latter may be peculiar to Vic??) These are just some examples of how undemocratic and unjust the system is.
James. the NO was for the VOICE in the Constitution. Nevertheless Alboes latest Idea shows his contempt for those of us who voted no. However they have got to do something, but perhaps it would be a good IDEA to think what it might be, that all will agree to, first
Fight Aussies Fight; the Globalists have bought out our Pollies who are now cardboard cutouts totally submissive & in lockstep with them(the Globalists)!!
Amen, sadly I don't think Aussies have eth same fight they used to, too brainwashed and scared to stand up for what they believe in for fear of losing worldly things or the illusion of control over their lives.
I see this differently, this is a good thing because their arrogance & stupidity ( oh they are so stooooopid) has received an almighty pushback from most, not all, of the great unwashed. The Voice big NO vote was an huge middle finger to these tyrants as part of the fallout from the Covid con, imo. You know, fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. Unfortunately ( for the good people who follow James) the less enlightened or keep fooling me until I finally get it crowd of (dumb?) Aussies need to feel a bit more pain before they finally read the programme & we can create a better system together. That is all.
The main reason I voted No was that I didn’t want the Voice enshrined in the Constitution. Our No votes have counted so far as that’s concerned. The Queensland Government has just announced they are going to go ahead with treaty, truth-telling, reconciliation and who knows what else. None of this surprises me after what WA did with the Heritage Act (still not abolished, I believe) and I remember vaguely, Victoria had some kind of Bill pass months ago of this nature. The only hope is the State Governments’ decisions will be abolished when a new party comes in, although I don’t see much difference in the major parties nowadays; I think most of them are tied up with the UN agendas.
I got an email just before the voice from Rockliff saying hello and how can I help with anything. No idea how he got my email?? I was planning to answer him by asking him how he voted Yes and why he was wrong and how I knew it was a complete lie and didn't he get that? Now I have just read your article...thank you more to put in my reply to him. It wont be kind. I will probably start with How dare you ...
I agree with Bella that they had a bigger Agenda. They needed our First Nation people as a separate "nation" to be able to treat with them, to manipulate their woke politicians and Elders so they could force Australia's compliance in their O.W. Agenda. And they're not stopping, so we need to speak up. Thanks for your engaging voice in all this. May God bless, strengthen and protect you and your family.
love your funny, insightful , truthful commentary, as usual James, but you obviously haven't been in a childcare facility lately if you think kids today are being taught to understand "No" ! They only learn that in a certain, probably conservative, family environment. Most children's babysitters, you know---the Telly, schools, Kindergartens, etc--aren't allowed to say "no", they're only allowed to distract the uncooperative beggars, I mean children. Plus, the Government never had any intention of listening. Like children ,the beggars, I mean politicians of certain persuasions, have been trying to distract US!
Agreed with all of what you say so eloquently James.... & yes Albo, go back to dealing with the other 97% of Australians & stop wasting our tax on your own personal "do-gooder" agendas!
This is genuinely distressing, James. Albanese's hero was Whitlam. Perhaps we'll get a double disillusion like someone else has mentioned I hope. Is that hoping too much? I think that's the only way that they ( Labor/teal/ green) are going to listen.
Albanese needs to go! He has wasted so many millions and still got a ‘no’. How thick can they be.
We need to keep the pressure on. Especially in the states. Queensland elections can’t come soon enough!
These politicians live in a different dimension.
Do we remember them saying to a waiter, "Don't you know who I am?" From a politician I had never heard of and still can't remember their name.
Whitlam didn't even try to ask us when he changed the constitution and turned us into a company (LLC) so they could go bankrupt every few years and not have to pay their loans back. That was totally illegal and means that the new constitution is not legal and we are still under the 1901 constitution, but they are using the new one because we have not stopped them by saying NO loud enough for them to hear and so they claim assumed consent, so we need to send them a message saying we never consented to the changes and they should all be arrested for treason and tried in military courts.
You're right again! I don't know why the states are all forging ahead with their own treaties (except for WA - burned recently by the Heritage Laws, no doubt). But I'm puzzled. Who are they making treaties with? Depending on what you read, there are between 250 and 500 mobs in Australia and they each have their own language and territory. Are we going to have to form treaties with each group? They were never "one nation" and will probably never be united. I have a better idea - let's just embrace them as Australians and live alongside them as equals. Why didn't we think of that before!
Lidia Thorpe made exactly that point. If you're going to make treaties (which she supports) the need to be done individually with each group since none can speak for the others.
I hadn't heard that comment, though I know she supports treaty. The orchestrators of the Voice really wanted it enshrined Federally, not in the state governments, because the Federal government has much deeper pockets and could afford to pay them a lot more. I was shocked to hear them say this! Just what we need, to bankrupt the country at a time such as this.
Only one comment to the brain dead PM and other Pollies who cant understand NO means NO !!! There is a age old phrase in theses situations ......." FOLLOW THE MONEY """
“The arrogance of this government is staggering. Which begs the question, are these guys idiots? “
Actually they’re not idiots. They are very arrogant in pursuing the aims of the elite and with great success. The failure of the expensive and toxic referendum is just a hiccup which, although it annoyingly lengthens the process for them, it can in their view, still be overcome. While it is reassuring that 6 in 10 Aussies are opposed to this route, it's a pity we can't get true representation in parliament. Unfortunately the enemy has mastered their manipulation of the so called democratic structure of our election processes when it comes to who finally governs. Did you know that taxpayer funding for parties for subsequent elections is based on the number of votes each party gets and by its cutoff point excludes all the minors. Did you know that in Victoria Comrade Dan's mate, Glen Druery setup a new party called the Sack Dan Andrews Party purely to trick voters and draw votes from other minor parties? Then there's the buying off of the preferences. (This latter may be peculiar to Vic??) These are just some examples of how undemocratic and unjust the system is.
Just wondering about Laura Tingle’s latest comment on ABC’s too balanced coverage.... Is she kidding??
James. the NO was for the VOICE in the Constitution. Nevertheless Alboes latest Idea shows his contempt for those of us who voted no. However they have got to do something, but perhaps it would be a good IDEA to think what it might be, that all will agree to, first
Fight Aussies Fight; the Globalists have bought out our Pollies who are now cardboard cutouts totally submissive & in lockstep with them(the Globalists)!!
Amen, sadly I don't think Aussies have eth same fight they used to, too brainwashed and scared to stand up for what they believe in for fear of losing worldly things or the illusion of control over their lives.
I see this differently, this is a good thing because their arrogance & stupidity ( oh they are so stooooopid) has received an almighty pushback from most, not all, of the great unwashed. The Voice big NO vote was an huge middle finger to these tyrants as part of the fallout from the Covid con, imo. You know, fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. Unfortunately ( for the good people who follow James) the less enlightened or keep fooling me until I finally get it crowd of (dumb?) Aussies need to feel a bit more pain before they finally read the programme & we can create a better system together. That is all.
Treasonous.
Surely?
you'd think so right
The main reason I voted No was that I didn’t want the Voice enshrined in the Constitution. Our No votes have counted so far as that’s concerned. The Queensland Government has just announced they are going to go ahead with treaty, truth-telling, reconciliation and who knows what else. None of this surprises me after what WA did with the Heritage Act (still not abolished, I believe) and I remember vaguely, Victoria had some kind of Bill pass months ago of this nature. The only hope is the State Governments’ decisions will be abolished when a new party comes in, although I don’t see much difference in the major parties nowadays; I think most of them are tied up with the UN agendas.