21 Comments

You can add Turnbull to that list above James.....they should never ever represent the Liberal Party again.....EVER!!

Expand full comment

my garden needs it too.

Expand full comment

I'd like to know why the media are not exposing the fact that many of the indigenous communities are totally unaware of the referendum at all. One indigenous leader asked the question of why the 97% non indigenous community is voting on the future of the 3% of indigenous. Many indigenous leaders are speaking out against the Voice, yet no one is letting them speak. In other words, they are being refused their own voice because they know that the moment this gets through, the indigenous will lose their sovereignty.

Expand full comment

I smell rats everywhere here. You are right about white ants. These people have infiltrated the Liberal Party and are destroying their ethos. What ones was a political party with integrity has been infiltrated with the intention of destroying them. This is a Greenie ruse to make every Australian like them - idiots! I have friends inAustralia from South Africa and they say this is exactly how Aparteid happened and now that country is in a huge mess. Do we want to go down that same road? I think not

Expand full comment

No, but all the white-ants, rats and nut cases want us to.

Expand full comment

Bridget Archer is the Libral Parties Judas… walks with them but stabs them in the back… not once 27 times… how many pieces of silver was she promised

Expand full comment

And when this referendum fails, as it should and probably will, will the media round these turncoats up and stick it to their egg-smeared faces?

Expand full comment

I agree with you James that cabinet members should support the party’s decision to vote NO as a block. Anyone opposing this should be removed to the backbench. They should have been moved as soon as Dutton became the leader.

Bridget Archer should have been kicked out of the Liberal Party long before now. If the Liberal’s really are the ‘broad church’, she would have voted with them more often than not.

Great article thanks

Expand full comment

It’s time for the liberal party to have a clear stance on aspects of policy that are affecting Australian life drastically...thank God for Peter Dutton who has finally given the Libs a stance on something the Libs have been so owned by the left they have had no clear stance on anything. Now that a stance or a line in the sand has been formed it’s time to clear the decks of people who don’t wish to follow...clear the leadership positions of people who continually sit on the fence or worse support the other argument. It’s time to stand as one or face complete political oblivion. Make way for the serious people who will fight for a cause...the Libs have lost so many fighters like Craig Kelly and are full of compilers or complete career politicians. Like Simon Birmingham we need some fighting MP’s like Tanya Davis and Jacinta Price or Warren Mundine it’s time to clear the fence sitters and the leftist out...why? because it’s a matter of sheer survival now everything is at stake and there is not much time before this referendum is up! Libs it’s time to prosecute the economic and traditional arguments...say no to the ideologies...net zero, the voice and transgenderism flooding the schools on economic and traditional grounds. it’s time to kick out the culture and economic crashers! Argue the economic case now before we all crash!

Expand full comment

Well James, having suffered white ant damage in our house,once, I am quite happy(free of charge) to suit up and forensically rid the "linos" from the Coalition in accordance with good and safe practices recommended for getting rid of termites.

A purge is needed now.

Expand full comment

Talk about the "enemy within " Archer is a divisive character and one could easily believe her to be a Labor plant. She holds very few conservative values ànd almost no Liberal party values. Mr Dutton needs to give these traitors the flick, after all they do more damage to the party from within than they would by being outside the team meetings. The disgusting disloyal retweeting of those leftie comments is the "dog act" and it is time someone told her.

Expand full comment

These white-ants remind me of the many reasons Parliament House (both state and federal) has also been referred to as a rat house. I also think of it as a nut house, due to all the nuts who inhabit the building nowadays. Perhaps it's the nuts that attract the rats to the house. That might explain why there are so many nutcases scattered all over the building. But unfortunately, the rats are not eating the nuts, but are instead, gathering them up from out in the wilderness and bringing them into the rat house.

But in this case (pun not intended), it is often difficult to differentiate between the rat and the nut, because in most cases, (pun not intended) they are one and the same thing. All day and all night, the rats, nuts and nutcases are busy biting and gnawing away at the fabric of society with the intent to destroy, by running around the rat house squeaking and squealing nonsense at the top of their voices, while feasting on the harvest of the tax-payer.

Expand full comment

I have 5 issues with the voice:_

1) who is an Aboriginal? If a person has 16 great great grandparents,( born say in the 1850s) and 1 was an Aboriginal why is this 1/16 person an Aborigine with special legal and voting rights as proposed by this referendum,? There is no time expiration to this vote. Go on 100 years and 4 generations and this 1/16 special legal case person becomes a 1/ 256 th person of mixed race claiming benefits,rights and grievance.

2) at the start of the referendum debate and requests for details a uni activist said there were more than 500 pages of agreed details that come with the voice. WHAT are the hidden agreed details?

3) a yes vote sets up a caste system based on race, just like the 3,000 year old caste system in India that is one of that countries biggest curses and limits on development.

4) trendy, woke politicians like these ants in the liberal party who want our vote to be decided on emotion/ feel good are ignoring the enormous legal changes a yes vote will bring.

This is a legal document, the foundation of all our other laws thiat is being changed and will be further changed over time by future parliments and court decisions. Nearly every govt decision can be challenged in the courts for decades to come by white elite activists and nothing to help those in genuine disadvantage will be done. It is simply a power grab by a small group

5) the night before the Uluru agreement was adopted by a private ,carefully selected group of activists the ABC reported that about 20% of those present walked out in protest Against the statement. This has never been mentioned again .20% of those present objected so strongly they simply walked out in protest.

Expand full comment

Thanks, James?Unfortunately, it appears that there has been so much of what liberal used to stand for eaten and now after decades of weakness on sensible, logical management, they have become a hollow shell with any hint of sanity vacuumed without trace in the hope to get votes. Now they seem surprised that their members have moved to tangential divisions. The whole voice issue sets up division. In the beginning we all descended from 1 man, and a red man at that (Adam = red man, as you no doubt know). Now we are trying to divide the nation with the voice. Communist doctrine- devide and conquer to be enshrined in law. What's next? We already have gender identity division, economic division and wokeian worship.

Expand full comment

Time for the fumigators to stop the damage before the house collapses, if that has not already happened.

When you need every member to form government and the support of the Greens and 3 independents like Gillard did then you don't want to sack anyone from the party, but when you are in opposition with no hope of winning any vote it is time to show some backbone and cut out the dead wood. Hopefully they will get rid of Photios and allow the Warringah motion to come into effect where locals choose their representative. Then it is up to the member to quiz those who want to represent them. That will finally give conservatives a voice.

Expand full comment

Yes, the Libs certainly need to do some serious gardening and pull out all the weeds because at the moment, the weeks are choking them!!!

Expand full comment

Thanks James ..🙏

Bridget Archer is attractive enough to join & feel very comfortable with LABOR or Greens parties .prerequisite for membership in both is to be BUTTUGLY

inside & out..

YOU made the grade Bridgy GO for it!!!👏👏

Expand full comment

It would seem that Bridget Archer and Simon Birmingham lack the courage of their convictions. The Liberal party is a broad church and allow varying opinions. That is their right but they need to be on the back bench. Bridget has stepped over the bounds and is engaging in very inappropriate behaviour. She should be censored and kicked out. Simon is just a vacuous Lino.

Expand full comment