The Media's New Term for "Women"

That a once esteemed newspaper now casually refers to "non-transgender women" as if that’s even a thing is a sign of just how far into insanity our culture has slipped

The trans movement will erase women completely.

If you don’t believe me; believe the New York Times.

The former newspaper published an article at the weekend in which they referred to women as “non-transgender women”.

In other words, women have now been placed in a classification slightly lower than chicks with dicks.

Trans women are the norm. Non-trans women are the anomaly.

I was talking about this stuff more than a decade ago, much to the bemusement of friends and colleagues.

They considered the trans movement to be a fringe issue that was best ignored.

But ideas have consequences. Language shapes thinking. Culture creates norms.

Churches should have been preaching the truth of Genesis 1v27 (not that God exists, but that women do) at least 10 years ago when this stuff first started raising its head.

But, typically, we wait until that which is on the fringe becomes the whole hairdo and then, in a panic, we hurriedly put a hat on it.

Women were called birthing parents.

Then they were called chest feeders.

Then they were called menstrators.

Then they were uterus havers.

Then they were vaginal presenting.

Then they were cisgendered.

And now women are non-trans women; a mere subset of a class that was once their’s and their’s alone but that now belongs to men as well. There are men and there are non men. Women are no more.

The degradation and misogyny is unbelievable!

Delusional men and their woke enablers have declassified women in order to re-classify themselves.

I’m struck by the irony, though.

The New York Times would not dare to refer to a woman as a “c$%t”, or a “slut”, or a “bitch” or a “whore” or a “hag”.

They just wouldn’t. You’re appalled that I even know those words, let alone wrote them.

But the women they would never call “molls”, they unhesitatingly call “non-transgender women”.

In their view the term is not offensive because, in their fantastical world, the term itself bends reality around to their insanity.

And this is the biggest outrage of the transgender movement. It imposes it’s fantasies as facts on a culture that has lost the balls (pun intended) to push back.

The NYT article was about a women’s volleyball competition that is fighting to ban a bloke who likes to think of himself as a woman from playing.

The journalist was writing about the issue of testosterone levels and penned the following sentence that went to print because evidently the sub editors and editors saw no problem …

"On its website, the N.C.A.A. says trans volleyball players are eligible to play if their testosterone level is less than 10 nanomoles per liter — that’s at least four times more than what many experts say is the top of the range for non-transgender women, and in the typical range for adult men."

Notice that the journalist refers to men as “men” but to women as “non-transgender women”.

At other points in the article, the reporter also referred to the female athletes as "athletes assigned female at birth."

I might say, a vagina does tend to assign one as female.

Language (or should I say lying) is vital for the trans movement since any slip-up and the truth will be immediately revealed.

If the reporter had compared transgendered women to women, then it would have been an admission that trans women were in fact something different to actual women.

So he had to use the term “non-transgender women” in order to infer that gender does not exist as a binary but on a spectrum.

If gender is on a spectrum then there are no “women”, only trans women and non-transwomen.

But, of course, we all know full well that gender is binary.

There are women who are more masculine than feminine and vice versa, but no-one can move from male to female or back the other way.

Sex (or gender. whatever) is a fixed biological reality. Everyone knows this, which is why they must lie and why the lies must become bolder and bolder.

That a once esteemed newspaper now casually refers to non-transgender women as if that’s even a thing is a sign of just how far into insanity our culture has slipped.

The trans movement is just an experiment to see how far citizens will allow the cultural elite to go in order to destroy everything, even reality itself.

Sadly, the experiment has been shockingly successful and shows little sign of abating.