It's Only a Crime to Be Jewish if It's in a Built Up Area

London police threaten to arrest a man for being "openly Jewish"

Gideon Falter is spoken to by a London police officer

Police around the Western world are doing nothing to curb increasingly hateful Pro-Palestinian rallies.

And every day they do nothing, it becomes harder to do something.

We are now at a point where the rights of ordinary citizens are subordinate to angry Islamist mobs who have commandeered the streets to yell support for terror organisations.

From Melbourne to London and New York City, the Islamists seem to be in control as law officials, whose wages are paid by our taxes, do their bidding.

The latest - and most disgraceful - example of police enforcing a version of sharia law occurred in the UK at the weekend where officers told a man to move on because of his “openly Jewish” appearance.

Gideon Falter was attempting to cross a road where members of the religion of peace were making their weekly call for the destruction of the Jewish state.

Police told Falter he could not cross the road and threatened him with arrest.

In a video that has now gone viral, Falter was told by members of the Londonistan Metropolitan Police …

“You are quite openly Jewish, this is a pro-Palestinian march.

“I’m not accusing you of anything but I’m worried about the reaction to your presence.”

It’s now a crime to be openly Jewish in London? Where should they be? In ghettos?

Or would London Jews be better off out of sight completely? Should they hide in an attic, perhaps? Or in a cupboard?

‘Never Again’ didn’t last very long, did it.

It’s like the Brits looked at 1940s Germany and said ‘hold my beer’.

Can you imagine police telling a woman …

‘Excuse me, Miss, but you are quite openly attractive and I'm worried about how those men over there might react. So you can either leave or I can arrest you for breaching public decency.’

Can you imagine police telling a man …

‘Excuse me but you’re quite openly gay and I’m worried about how people exiting that church over there might react. So you can either leave or I can arrest you for breaching public decency.’

Or what about this …

‘Excuse me sir, but you’re quite openly black and I’m worried about how those white people over there might react. So you can either leave or I can arrest you for breaching public decency.’

Police wouldn't think to do such a thing. The very idea is laughable.

But, in 2024, there is one rule for Jews and one rule for everybody else. We can’t have Jews popping up in the wrong places.

A second Met Police officer told Falter his presence on the street was “antagonising”. The officer advised him …

“You will be escorted out of this area so you can go about your business — go where you want freely — or, if you choose to remain here, because you are causing a breach of peace with all these other people, you will be arrested.”

So Jews can no longer walk along the street in London without being arrested. For their own good, of course.

If the supposedly peaceful Pro-Palestinian marches are deemed so dangerous that a man cannot walk past them while looking Jewish, the marches should be banned.

Instead, Jews are rounded up to keep London’s Islamists happy.

We don’t want Muhammad to crack it.

Could there be a more obvious, not to mention dangerous, example of appeasement?

Let me put it another way …

If a Jewish man can't cross the road during a Pro-Palestinian march, then it's clearly not a Pro-Palestinian march at all: it's an anti-semitic march.

Later in the video, Falter is threatened by a Muslim protestor who tells him, with more than a little confidence, that police will not intervene.

And sure enough, police are right there on the scene, not intervening.

Instead, the police (and I’m not making this up) were forming a protective cordon around the Pro-Palestinian protestors, presumably to prevent anyone from offending or upsetting them.

This is the very definition of mob rule.

In what sense is Britain still British? But I digress.

After video of the incident went viral on Twitter, Assistant Police Commissioner Matt Twist issued an apology.

But he added that opponents of the march, by which I think he meant “targets of the march” …

“Must know that their presence is provocative” and that they are “increasing the likelihood of an altercation by lining the route”.

But Falter was not “lining the route”. He was trying to cross the road to get to a synagogue!

And even if he had been, as the London coppers like to say, “lining the route” … so what?

The apology was so obviously flawed that police command quickly deleted it from their social media channels.

They had a second try, this time writing …

“The use of the term ‘openly Jewish’ by one of our officers is hugely regrettable. We know it will have caused offence to many. We ­reiterate our apology.

“Being Jewish is not a provocation. Jewish Londoners must be able to feel safe in this city.

Our commitment to protecting the public extends to all communities across London. It’s ­important that our public statements reflect that more clearly than they did today.”

Thank God London coppers made the above statement about an earlier statement commenting on a statement from one of their officers.

That clears things up no end. And here I was thinking I’d seen every Monty Python sketch!

What has become of the Western world when British police have to put out - not one, but two - statements in order to clarify that “being Jewish is not a provocation”.

And use of the term “openly Jewish” is not just “regrettable”, it is blatant racial discrimination.

The entire establishment in the UK are cowards. The incident was surely an admission that public officials have lost control of their own country.

In February conservative UK MP Paul Scully said there were “no-go areas” in the UK, prompting accusations of Islamophobia and a stinging rebuke from the Prime Minister.

Scully was forced to apologise.

And yet now, just weeks later, the Metropolitan Police have confirmed Scully was right all along.