Bowen's EV Fantasy
The real reason politicians have a stupid grin when posing with electric vehicles
Politicians used to kiss babies. These days they stand, grinning from ear to ear, beside short range carriers of large heavy batteries, also known as electric vehicles.
It’s a wonder our MPs don’t kiss EVs as if they were babies, such is their affection for them.
I liked politicians better when they spent their time annoying babies. At least babies are real. Electric vehicles are not; at least they are not real alternatives to internal combustion engine vehicles.
Australia produces 1.3% of global carbon emissions. And emissions from passenger vehicles account for about 10% of that.
If we convinced half of all drivers to switch from their internal combustion engines to electric vehicles, our contribution to world emissions would drop by 0.0026%
Take that weather!
You know how I said politicians love to grin standing beside electric cars? Well, it’s a stupid grin.
For all the inconvenience and expenditure, we will make almost no difference to global emissions and absolutely no difference to the climate.
But since when has spending enormous amounts of taxpayer money to affect no change whatsoever deterred the political class?
Our government wants to offer tax incentives for people purchasing electric vehicles.
If EVs didn’t need battery replacements, if EVs had long range, if EVs didn’t have such a bad reliability rating, if EVs didn’t take forever to recharge (if you can find a charging station and if that charging station isn’t already being used), and if EVs didn’t burst into flames, well then maybe the government wouldn’t have to offer incentives for people to buy them. Just a thought.
In three minutes you can fill the fuel tank of a Ford Mustang and have a 500km range. The Mustang Mach-E needs to be charged for 10 hours to get the same result.
No problem, charge it overnight, they say!
Sure thing, just as soon as I get those lunar panels on the roof of my house.
Speaking of power shortages, cars in the UK travel 250 billion kilometres every year. If the smallest EV was used to travel that distance it would demand 16% more of the national electricity grid that is currently being used.
Author Ian Plimer writes:
“Where will this extra electricity come from? If it was from wind, then there would need to be an extra 10,000 onshore and 5,000 offshore wind turbines requiring a subsidy of at least 2 billion pounds (AUD$3.5b) per annum.”
As Plimer points out, this would be a double whammy for England’s poor for whom the cost of electricity would skyrocket to pay for all the electric cars they cannot afford.
One more thing …
According to the International Energy Agency, if the world was to switch to EVs by 2040, the production of lithium would need to rise by 4200%, graphite by 2500%, nickel by 1900% and other rare earth elements by 700% compared to 2020 production of these metals.
Such mineral deposits do not currently exist.
Bottom line? We are headed for a world in which freedom of moment exists only for the rich since they are the only ones who car afford EVs and the electricity to run them. Everyone else will be catching the bus. Chris Bowen earns well over $200,000 a year which explains the stupid grin.
Bowen is an idiot.
Can you imagine one of those E-utes with the cement mixer, half a pallet of bricks and a few bags of cement, tools and lunch esky? It wouldn't make it to the end of the street. What about all those city folk who don't have off street parking? Get an extension cord and run it out of the top floor of your inner city apartment. In rural and remote areas the range just won't cut it. What about the money the government earns from fuel tax? EVs are heavy. Even a hybrid is around 500kg heavier that a standard petrol or diesel car. Who's paying for the road repairs, as if they aren't bad enough already.
I picked up a copy of Ian Pilmer's Green Murder and so far it is a fascinating read. Albanese and Bowen could do well to pull their heads out of their backsides and have a read of what Pilmer has to say because he is one of many who actually know what they are talking about.
The electric car fantasy and the climate change scam that drives it are quite possibly the largest ever smoke and mirrors trick in humanity's short and troubled history. It's as if these folks truly believe that rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic would have made all the difference. In reality the problem they think they're solving now is creating a mountain of problems yet to be realised somewhere down the road.
And you're spot on James... none of those calling the shots and making the policies will be affected greatly by the decisions they make and the edicts they proclaim. Oh no, that price will be paid by the majority who struggle just to put food on the table at the moment.
But, it's a price our leaders are graciously and magnanimously prepared for the rest of us to pay.