Why Woke BBC Cut Ties With Woke Stonewall

Europe's largest LGBTQ lobby group pushes the trans issue too far, even for the BBC

THE BBC has cut ties with LGBTQ lobby group Stonewall after the group suggested that lesbians who don’t want to have sex with women who have penises are “sexual racists”.

(No, that opening sentence doesn’t make any sense no matter how many times you read it! Read on at your own risk, and don’t say you weren’t warned)

Stonewall is paid millions of pounds each year to advise public bodies on how to embed ‘LGBTQ+ inclusion’ in the way they work.

Their clients, who employ more than 4 million Brits combined, include government departments, police forces, universities and even MI6, as well as a range of private companies.

The BBC had been one of Stonewall’s biggest clients.

But that all changed when the BBC published a report on lesbians being pressured to have sex with trans women by which I mean men who said they were women but who (how can I put this) were still packing the two meat and veg.

Lesbians told the BBC they were being called transphobic for refusing sex with their well hung ‘sisters’ and being pressured to ‘accept the idea that a penis can be a female sex organ’.

One woman told the BBC …

‘I was told I owed it to my trans sisters to unlearn my “genital confusion”.’

Stonewall tried to prevent the BBC from publishing the story.

Stonewall boss Nancy Kelley

The group’s chief executive, Nancy Kelley, wrote to the editorial director of BBC News accusing them of promoting ‘sexual racism’.

According to reports, Kelley acknowledged that in sexual relationships ‘consent is paramount and we all want who we want’.

She said …

‘If you find that when dating, you are writing off entire groups of people, like people of colour, fat people, disabled people or trans people, then it's worth considering how societal prejudices may have shaped your attractions.’

She added that ‘structural oppression can influence who we want’.

In other words, lesbians would want to have sex with penis wielding women if it wasn’t for their unconscious bias that - you guessed it - can only be overcome by having sex with chicks with dicks.

You have to hand it to the guys in dresses at Stonewall …

‘You’d want to have sex with us if it wasn’t for your bigotry that can only be overcome by having sex with us. You don’t want to be a bigot now, do you baby?’

Well played.

The BBC, which had for years been part of Stonewall’s Champions of Diversity Program, said they deliberated for months before deciding to ignore Kelley’s protests and run the story.

I’m not sure if we were meant to be impressed that it took BBC editors months to work out that Stonewall now advocates on behalf of predatory men attempting to guilt women into sex. But there you go.

The BBC said the article had gone through a ‘rigorous editorial processes’.

Again, were we meant to be reassured? What sort of rigorous process is required to conclude that a penis is not a female sex organ? The mind boggles.

Anyway, the story was published and two weeks later the BBC announced it was no longer paying Stonewall to vet them on whether their editorial policies were sufficiently Woke.

The BBC was concerned about the LGBT activist group influencing editorial policy.

You think?

Stonewall had already convinced the BBC to adopt new definitions that would mean trans men – biological females – who retain their vaginas can be gay if they are attracted to men, while trans women – biological males – with penises can be lesbians.

The entire episode, that played out late last year, shone a light on the influence Stonewall has on hundreds of companies - from SKY television to Rolls Royce - that pay to participate in it’s Diversity Champions Program and who via to be listed in Stonewall’s Top 100 Employees list.

Stonewall provide a list of criteria by which participating organisations are judged for their LGBTQ friendliness and given a score annually.

Criteria includes everything from what health benefits they provide especially for LGBTQ people, to whether or not they vet suppliers for a commitment to LGBTQ inclusion before contracting them.

A specially trained LGBTQ+ inclusion expert then takes two hours each year to sit with company executives to review their progress and recommend ways they can improve.

Stonewall promises to “share far and wide” the names of the top 100 companies.

It’s a two edged sword though since once you join, you cannot un-join without being pilloried in the press for turning your back on vulnerable LGBTQ+ people.

And a significant amount of the criticism ends up coming from your own staff who have been trained by Stonewall to be activist employees.

The BBC decided to cut ties with Europe’s largest LBGTQ lobby group anyway.

Woke BBC cancelled Woke Stonewall.