The ABC is Shocked Catholic Doctrine Doesn't Reflect the ABC Queer Instagram Feed
Archbishop Porteous under fire for "draconian" views
The ABC have breathlessly reported that trans activists and Greens MPs don’t like Catholic doctrine.
Next they’ll report that the sky is blue and that birds use wings to fly.
Journalists at the national broadcaster appear shocked that Catholics have not yet updated their 2000-year old doctrine to better reflect the ABC Queer Instagram account.
The ABC News headline read …
“Catholic archbishop’s denouncement of transgender lobby, legal abortion, euthanasia, same sex marriage, heavily criticised”
Whoa!
Christian beliefs on sexuality, gender and the sanctity of life are being criticised by lefties? No way!
When did this happen, apart from every day since the beginning of time, I mean.
The report continued …
A letter written by the Archbishop of Hobart and circulated to Catholic school students statewide, has been criticised as transphobic, homophobic and draconian by LGBTIQA+ advocates and others.
Well, judging by the reaction, I’d say the Archbishop is probably saying all the right things.
I imagine the 10 Commandments do seem a little, er, draconian to a culture in which the only truth is “my truth”.
And I’m hardly surprised that the alphabet community (for the love of God can someone please explain to me who the “plus” people are!) aren’t on board with Jesus.
His endorsement of biology, traditional marriage and the sanctify of life are the sort of views for which one could find themselves being crucified by an angry mob these days.
Speaking of angry mob …
Equality Tasmania president Rowan Richardson told the ABC …
"This letter has a number of misinformation and disinformation, and also some homophobic and transphobic beliefs in it.”
That’s a very modern way of saying “I don’t like what he said”.
It continued …
Mr Richardson — a transgender man, and schoolteacher — said the letter created "a climate where young people don't feel safe to explore who they are".
That’s the left’s narrative, to be sure.
There is, of course, another way of looking at it.
Why not, instead, say that the Archbishop’s letter outlines clear boundaries within which young people are safe to explore who God created them to be?
Well, because the left don’t like those boundaries. The left don’t like any boundaries because boundaries presuppose an authority beyond themselves.
And that’s the real problem with the Archbishop’s letter.
No wonder the left manifest like an Irish Eurovision contestant.
The Archbishop wrote that students who disagreed with Catholic doctrine “should seek an alternative educational institution more aligned with their views”.
Wait. I thought he was forcing his ideology down other people’s throats.
Oh wait, no, that’s the left.
Former Labor MP and union official Doug Cameron tweeted …
Catholic schools that promote divisive, dangerous US inspired stupidity, should not receive public funding. Religious extremism, has no place in Australian society. Religious freedom is ok, bigotry, homophobia ,vilifying our fellow Australians is not!
Hilarious.
First, of course Catholic doctrine is divisive. So what! Putting pineapple on pizza is also divisive.
Second, Christian doctrine did not originate in Trump’s White House. It originated in the Middle East.
Third, Christians pay taxes so deserve to get something for it. And if you defund Catholic schools, 20 percent of Australian kids will suddenly be thrust upon the State system, breaking it. Good luck with that Doug.
Fourth, the idea that God created humans male and female is not “religious extremism”, it’s biology.
Fifth, to say Christianity has “no place in Australian society” is just silly. Do you really want to live in a country where Christianity has no place? Would you prefer Xi Jinping, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei or Kim Jong-un?
It’s because you live in a Christian country that you have the freedom to tweet your anti-Christian nonsense!
Sixth, to say “Religious freedom is ok, bigotry etc is not” is really just another way of saying “Religious freedom is ok so long as it comports with my religious views” which is just another way of outing yourself as a typical progressive left authoritarian.
But back to the ABC article …
Independent Tasmanian MP Kristie Johnston, whose child attends a Catholic school and received the letter, said she was "deeply disturbed" by its contents.
"What [Archbishop Porteous] has said is nothing short of hateful speech," Ms Johnston said.
With the greatest of respect, Ms Johnston must be the most ignorant person in Tasmania. Imagine sending your child to a Catholic school only to be shocked to discover it was a Catholic school.
And no Ms Johnston, the Archbishop didn’t say anything hateful. I think this is a case of you hearing something you don’t like and then projecting your own reaction onto the Bishop.
Tasmanian Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff also condemned the letter.
Greens gonna green.
Ms Woodruff told the ABC she would “consider what the next step should be”.
Next step?
I’d suggest a cup of tea and a lie down.
No?
"It clearly is a breach of, in our view, anti-discrimination laws,” Ms Woodruff said.
Ah yes, drag the Archbishop off to the lefty inquisition courts. Tar and feather him for daring to say what everyone believed up until five minutes ago.
Teach the Catholics lefty inclusion and love by excluding and defunding them.
Woodruff thundered …
"To call out people who are living their lives — trans people, non-married people, people who have sex outside of marriage — and to essentially demonise them … it has no place in Tasmania."
Ah. Now we are getting to the nub of the issue.
Ms Woodruff would prefer the Archbishop turn a blind eye to sin. Well, Ms Woodruff, wouldn’t we all.
But if Jesus is God (as Catholics believe) then we are not.
If Jesus is the lawgiver, then we are not a rule unto ourselves, no matter how much we would like to be.
That’s hard to hear. And that message always provokes a reaction that reveals what is in a human heart.
‘Forgive me Lord. Help me do better,’ is one reply.
‘Crucify the damn Archbishop,’ is another.
The Archbishop’s letter, interesting as it is, is far less revealing than the response.
This is one of your best pieces James . Blisteringly wonderful & so accurate ! I’m actually going to forward a copy to the Archbishop’s office so he can use it to both console himself and defend himself from the pile on that will no doubt be descending upon him poor man .
I’m actually going to also give it to the year 9 English Co-ordinator at my daughters Catholic school to a/ teach the kids how to write analytically & persuasively and b/ to help them dissect &process these issues that our society continuously throws at them
"The left don’t like any boundaries" - sorry James, I beg to differ. They have one very strong boundary: You are not allowed to disagree with their views.