Tennis Australia Wants Trans Women To Give 'Trans Women' a Shot

Craig Tiley doesn't understand fairness, biology, or history

Is there a more Woke sporting organisation in the country besides Tennis Australia?

Sorry. I’ll ask you a more difficult question.

Is the sky blue?

Tennis Australia boss Craig Tiley has announced that he wants biological men to be able to compete in women’s tennis.

You don’t need to ask his rationale. Just repeat after me. “Inclusion. Diversity. Equity.” It’s a magical formula that makes sense of the nonsensical, the more you chant it.

Chant it often enough and eventually you’ll be convinced that women can have a penis.

“Quite clearly,” British politician Sir Edward Davey recently told LBC radio.

How Sir Davey knows he is a Sir and not a Dame is a complete mystery. But I digress.

Inclusion.

Diversity.

Equity.

Say it again and see how a world of impossibility suddenly becomes quite possible. Repeat it often enough and you’ll soon qualify to run a major corporation in this country.

Oh, important point. You must not mention the word “fairness” and you must never, ever - under any circumstances - mention the word “biology”.

Fairness and biology tend to ruin inclusion, diversity and equity by introducing the concept of “truth” … another word that you are best never to contemplate.

Tiley told the Sydney Morning Herald this week that Tennis Australia was trying to influence the International Tennis Federation and the Women’s Tennis Association to allow biological men who identify as women to play in the women’s competition.

It’s an idea brimming with possibilities.

When Novak Djokovic’s body becomes too tired to compete on the gruelling men’s tour, Nicole Djokovic can enter the women’s tour and add 100 grand slam titles to Novak’s 22.

That’s if Rochelle Nadal doesn’t beat her to it.

Tilley told the SMH excitedly …

“We are an organisation that believes in absolutely in inclusivity, in diversity, in equality – so any decision made will need to be aligned with our core values,” Tiley said.

I know what you’re thinking. What about believing in biology? What about the value of fairness.

What did I tell you? Don’t think about such things or you will never understand Western culture, let alone land a CEO’s job.

As if Tilley’s religious-like confession wasn’t enough, the SMH quoted another Tennis Australia spokesman saying: “Inclusion and equality were ‘at the heart’ of tennis.”

What does that even mean?

What’s even more amazing about this is that the SMH article states:

There are no known transgender tennis players currently seeking to compete at the elite level.

It’s not like there’s a woman trapped in the wrong tennis player’s body desperate for his shot at glory on the women’s tour.

It’s that Tiley is a woketard trapped in a sports administrator’s body desperate for his shot at virtue signalling on the world stage.

The ITF and WTA’s current policies currently permit trans athletes to play depending on testosterone levels. In other words, they have reduced men to a hormone that can be manipulated. Or is it women? Whatever. Adjust your testosterone levels and you can be who you want. You’re just a chemistry set.

What a great day it will be at the Australian Open when a man wins both the Men’s Open and the Women’s Open.

So much inclusion. So much diversity. So much equity. So much for sport.

The first time a biological man faced off against a woman in tennis was back in 1973.

Bobby Riggs, aged 55, took on Margaret Court who, at age 30, was on her way to finishing as the world’s number one female player for the seventh straight year.

Bobby Riggs smashed Margaret Court

Riggs smashed Court 6-2, 6-1.

The middle-aged hustler then took on Billie Jean King.

The match was billed as the “Battle of the Sexes” and was played before a crowd of 30,000 people.

The 29-year-old King went down 6-4, 6-3, 6-3 to the 55-year-old bloke.

Billie Jean King before she was humiliated by Bobby Riggs

In 1992 Jimmy Connors took on Martina Navratilova, beating her 7-5, 6-2.

Before you get too excited at the close first set, Connors was 35-years-old.

Connors was only allowed one serve, while Navratilova was permitted two.

Connors had to use the singles court while Navratilova was allowed to hit into the doubles court.

But yeah, aside from the game being rigged against old man Connors, it was all inclusion, diversity and equity.

Connors later admitted that he had bet $1 million that he would beat Navratilova in straight sets and not lose more than eight games.

Cha-ching!

But the truest test between a male and female tennis player came at the Australian Open in 1988 after the Williams sisters - Venus and Serena - boasted that they could beat any male player ranked outside the top 200.

The challenge was taken up by 30-year-old German Karsten Braasch who was ranked 203 in the world.

He took on the sisters, one after the other, on Court 12 having earlier that day played a round of golf and had a couple of shandys, as you do when preparing for an important women’s match as a biological male.

He beat Serena 6-1.

Then he beat Venus 6-2.

He later told journalists that he had played like a man ranked 600 in the world “to keep it interesting”.

Craig Tiley, who clearly missed the match, should leave women’s tennis for women to keep it interesting.