The James Macpherson Report

Share this post

User's avatar
The James Macpherson Report
Supreme Court to Decide on the Definition of a Woman

Supreme Court to Decide on the Definition of a Woman

James Macpherson's avatar
James Macpherson
Apr 16, 2025
∙ Paid
42

Share this post

User's avatar
The James Macpherson Report
Supreme Court to Decide on the Definition of a Woman
20
2
Share

We all know what a woman is, and it isn’t someone who was born male.

But since when has science, logic, history or common sense interrupted the West’s rapid descent into cultural chaos?

While China and Russia expand their pernicious influence around the world, we in the Western world continue to argue about how to define a woman.

A panel of five UK Supreme Court judges are due to rule today on what a woman is after a women’s group decided to take on the Scottish Government over gender definitions.

It all began back in 2018 when the Scottish Government mandated quotas for the number of women who should be represented on public boards.

You can already guess the problem, can’t you.

Who counts as a woman for the purposes of increasing female participation on public boards?

Do only women count as women? Or can you include men as women for the purposes of counting women?

Yes, that’s the question occupying the Scottish Government right now.

The government’s Gender Representation on Public Boards Act stated that anyone who was “living” as a woman was a woman, provided of course they planned on one day going through the gender recognition process.

Cue howls of laugher.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The James Macpherson Report to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 James Macpherson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share