For the Greta Good
Five days after Saint Greta gave her blessing to nuclear power, Germany has announced it will start up its reactors again.
Say what you like about the Goblin of Doom, the pony-tailed climate catastrophist has priestly powers!
As the Good (climate) Book says:
“Truly I tell you, whatever Greta binds in the media will be bound on earth, and whatever Greta looses in the media will be loosed on earth.” (Gore 18v18)
Germany is the world's seventh-largest energy consumer and has spent $580 billion on renewables in a bid to avoid climate armageddon.
Its energy back-up (for when the wind don’t blow and the sun don’t shine) was a pipeline from Russia that supplied more than 50 per cent of its gas.
Former US President Orange Man Bad warned the Germans it was foolish to rely on a mad Russian dictator for their energy supply.
The Germans mocked him. What did Trump know, aside from mean Tweets?
But with Vlad’s pipe now turned off, and with winter rapidly approaching, the mockery has turned to a weird mixture of nervous laughter and pre-emptive shivering. Germans are stocking up on firewood for winter.
I wrote last week that Saint Greta had proclaimed what people with a brain had been saying for a long time - if you’re worried about energy and emissions, go nuclear.
Feeling reassured by Saint Greta’s blessing, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz took less than a week to act.
Olaf announced Monday he would create the "legal basis" necessary to keep the country’s three remaining nuclear plants - now sanctified by the High Priest of Green - running until at least mid-April.
Truly I say unto you, Greta works in mysterious ways.
Just on that, a study reported in Forbes Magazine found that if the Germans had spent $580 billion on nuclear power instead of on solar, wind and associated grid upgrades, their county would be completely self sufficient for energy.
And 100 per cent of its power would be from clean energy.
So what’s the problem?
Well a lot of the key people pushing Net Zero are big investors in renewable technology. They don’t want nuclear because they are set to make billions from solar and wind.
When you understand that, you start to understand what this whole thing is really all about.
It is still bizarre to me that the rantings of a relatively uneducated teenager are praised and yet the geological evidence of a scientist like Plimer are dismissed. If this man made climate thing is so real why are they not using prominent, highly educated scientists as their pin up promotional representatives. In truth, I suspect because no scientist would want to be remembered for feeding into "The Great Lie".
'For the Greta Good'... gold.